| Papers [1-7] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 15] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 —> | Search results on "ARGUMENT PAPERS": |
|
|
The Teleological Argument, 2007.
A critical analysis of the flaws inherent in the teleological argument.
962 words (approx. 3.8 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 34.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper critically analyzes the teleological argument, which is an argument based on the idea that the universe is too complicated to have been created by accident and so must have had a creator. The paper describes the basis for this argument and then presents the problems that are inherent in it and concludes that the argument is flawed.
From the Paper
"A second problem with the teleological argument is based on the idea that design and purpose are linked. In Natural Theology, William Paley used the example of a watch to show how design and purpose are linked. He stated that a watch serves a specific purpose and has been designed with that purpose in mind. This shows intelligent design. This analogy is then applied to life and the universe and used to conclude that life must have been designed intelligently since everything created serves a purpose. Paley made this argument by stating that "every manifestation of design, which existed in the watch, exists in the works of nature; with the difference, on the side of nature, of being greater and more, and that in a degree which exceeds all computation." The problem with this argument is that there is no certainty that things are intentionally created with a certain purpose. In the case of a watch, it is created for the purpose of creating time. However, this is not necessarily true of the creations of the universe. Consider a simple example such as the creation of a tomato. The teleological argument would state that because a tomato is used for food, it must have been created for the purpose of providing others with a food source. However, it could also be said that a tomato is used as a food source because it is good to eat. This second view is based on the idea that created items are used for the purpose to which they are suited. This does not mean that they had to be designed for this purpose and so intelligent design is not necessary. Instead, one could argue that whatever is accidentally created is used for the purpose to which it is suited. In this way, the fact that something serves a purpose is not proof that it was designed for that purpose and so intelligent design is not a certainty."
| |
|
Argumentative Web Sites, 2002.
A review of two different websites that make different kinds of argumentative claims, one political, one commercial.
1,248 words (approx. 5.0 pages), 2 sources, APA, $ 42.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how a great deal of human communication is in the nature of argumentation and how in this day and age the ?speech? that is going on on Web sites is also in the nature of (rhetorical) argument. It examines two different websites that make argumentative claims that the author was inclined to reject to help to determine the strength and persuasiveness of those claims. The first site is the Jeb Bush gubernatorial re-elections site and it evaluates how election sites are in many ways the quintessence of argumentative speech because the stakes are so high and the second site is that of Pepsi site to see if the author could be swayed to drink Pepsi.
From the Paper
"In asking what would constitute a good web-based argument for this candidacy, the answer would be one that supplied enough substantive coverage of the governor in a sufficiently balanced way that I would want to vote for him if I lived in Florida. This means that while the rhetoric should be persuasive it should not seem forced ? or so positive that it seems false.
The rhetoric on this site lacks that sense of balance. For example: The homepage of the site has a number of different options, such as ?Women for Jeb?, ?Hispanics for Jeb?, ?Seniors for Jeb?. I find it hard to believe that people actually think of themselves in this way. The Web site?s categorization of people into convenient, poll-oriented demographics makes the campaign seem soulless and calculating, surely not the intention of the Bush advisors."
| |
|
A Persuasive Argument, 2002.
A persuasive argument based on theory and strategies from social psychology.
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 1 source, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is an argument using strategies of persuasion and influence. The argument is based on the theory and suggested strategies, and is as realistic as you make such a proposal.
| |
|
Definition, Rebuttal and Proposal Arguments, 2002.
Argumentative essays on race, abortion and global warming.
2,900 words (approx. 11.6 pages), 10 sources, $ 106.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
These three argumentative essays define race in the progressive era, perform a rebuttal against pro-abortion issues and propose how to combat global warming.
| |
|
Analysis of an Argument, 2002.
An analysis of a Waymarsh College article and the lines of argument.
650 words (approx. 2.6 pages), 3 sources, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
An essay dedicated to analysis of the author's line of reasoning in the Waymarsh College article, use of evidence, writing deficiencies and a discussion of what he might do to make his argument more sound.
| |
|
Anti-Abortion Argument, 2006.
Presents arguments against abortion.
762 words (approx. 3.0 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 27.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents the argument that abortion is wrong. The paper explores the development of the fetus as well as the moral issue surrounding the topic.
Outline:
Introduction
Pro-Life
Pro-Choice
Rebuttal
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Life is something that should be valued. The beat of a heart, the curl of a toe and evidence of a brain are all indicators that a human being exists. Putting aside the religious issues the moral and legal issues dictate that pro-life is the only possible choice. "
"When babies can be saved that way one pound, how can medical science say that a fetus is not a person? If a person is allowed to get an abortion up to four months into the pregnancy and a baby being born at four months is now sometimes a viable life, how can one draw any other conclusion except that abortion is indeed murder? "
| |
|
Abortion Arguments, 2002.
Presenting arguments for and against abortion - citing medical, moral and religious reasons.
1,687 words (approx. 6.7 pages), 9 sources, MLA, $ 54.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the arguments of both sides of the abortion debate. It evaluates the ethical issues underlying the anti-abortion crusade, with particular emphasis on the rights of the fetus. The paper then looks at the pro-abortion movement, focusing on the constitutional underpinnings of reproductive rights. In the conclusion, the paper argues against criminalizing abortion once again, because making abortion a crime will not stop abortions from occurring. Instead, making abortion illegal will only serve to hurt women?s reproductive rights without adequately addressing the central concerns of the pro-life movement.
From the Paper
"In 1973, through the landmark case of Roe vs. Wade, the Supreme Court made first trimester abortions legal in the United States. The decision struck down a host of state anti-abortion statutes and was hailed as a landmark of women?s reproductive rights. It also gave birth to a vocal umbrella movement of anti-abortion groups which continue to challenge Roe vs. Wade both on moral and legal grounds.
Almost three decades later, the issue of abortion remains the greatest moral flashpoint facing America today. More than any other moral issue, the question of abortion has divided communities, determined the outcome of many elections and incited quiet citizens to become activists."
|
|
|
